Home > User Reviews > HotKeys
User Reviews
HotKeys
HotKeys gives you fast and easy access to a lot of common elements through keyboard shortcuts. You can use it to define hotkeys to open web pages, launch programs, send keystrokes to other applicatio ...
Average of 4 user ratings: 
Click here to post your own review
- Apr 25, 2006
- For version:
- 1.51
A must-have 
- Interface: 3
- Features: 4
- Ease of use: 5
- Value: 5
- Overall:
Small, fast, handy, useful.. I can't imagine my everyday's work on a computer without it.
Review by: AnonymMan (28)
Read all 28 reviews by AnonymMan
- Mar 08, 2006
- For version:
- 1.51
There are much better 'hotkey' programs
- Interface: 2
- Features: 2
- Ease of use: 2
- Value: 2
- Overall:
Probably you don't know HotkeyP. HotKeys does not support multimedia keys, choosing keys is annoying (from menu), it is installed to Program files automatically... Anyway, not too bad, but there are much better 'hotkey' programs!
Review by: Dreamer888 (17)
Read all 17 reviews by Dreamer888
- Feb 01, 2006
- For version:
- 1.51
Just what i was looking for..
- Interface: 5
- Features: 5
- Ease of use: 5
- Value: 5
- Overall:
Simply put this is pretty awesome hotkey program, its much much easier to use than hotkeys since it has an interface but i think it used more resources at most 6 mbs, accordingly it just works, comes with predefined hotkeys, and supports all the keys on the keyboard, and programs and commands mainly got it so i can assigned a hotkey for starter (also available on snapfiles) but now i found more uses, it's worth a try, it's free.
Review by: Ghost_grey (56)
Read all 56 reviews by Ghost_grey
- Nov 17, 2005
- For version:
- 1.51
Small, effective, and flexible.
- Interface: 4
- Features: 4
- Ease of use: 5
- Value: 4
- Overall:
Just what the title says--it is a small file size, it's straight-forward, and very configurable. My only complaint is the memory footprint--on my system, it uses almost 8MB when just residing in the background. It's not a lot to some people, but it seems a little much for the task it performs.
Review by: ricojonah (2)
Read all 2 reviews by ricojonah
